| Safety |
|
|
ArticleSuccessful great streets should produce transportation and LAND USE solutions that are both safe and feasible, while at the same time balancing other community values. Above all else, the public values safety and expects that transportation agencies will only implement solutions that provide an acceptable level of safety. The geometric design for a thoroughfare should properly reflect safety for all modes of travel. It should do so within the context of a host of constraints and considerations, including the type of place, land use features (both existing and planned), roadside and community effects, and cost considerations. Consider the images below - where would you feel safer walking?
Safety is a broad term and can have a variety of meanings depending on the setting. In the world of great street planning and design, two types of safety are often referred to: nominal safety and SUBSTANTIVE SAFETY.
For great streets, we are most interested in the issue of substantive safety. A great street design element should not necessarily be deemed unsafe simply because it does not comply with a particular standard or guideline. While noncompliance can be an issue, a thoroughfare's substantive safety - its "track record" - is a more fundamental consideration and is based on actual performance at a specific location. When we talk about substantive safety for great streets, we are talking primarily about the crash risk that exists for all modes of travel: vehicular, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit. Great streets must provide environments in which all of these users can operate safely, without risk (or fear) of being involved in a crash. There are two very important great street characteristics to point out in this regard: 1. High pedestrian presence is a hallmark of most great streets. In order to encourage such presence, the place must provide a safe environment for these users.
Specific Points for Small Town Downtowns:
East-West Gateway has identified pedestrian safety as a critical component of the region’s travel safety initiative, based in part on the following considerations: 1. Nearly 40 fatal crashes and a multitude of non-fatal but injury-inducing crashes involving pedestrians are reported in the eight-county St. Louis region each year. A significant portion of these crashes may have been preventable. As illustrated in the graph at right, vehicle travel speed also significantly influences pedestrian safety. 2. Children, persons with disabilities, and older adults are the population segments at greatest risk for crash-related death or injury as pedestrians. These groups, namely older adults, also represent some of the nation’s fastest-growing population segments.
3. The nation’s most desirable, livable communities are overwhelmingly pedestrian-friendly places. Downtown loft districts, mixed use developments, revitalized city centers, and new urbanist communities all require provisions for safe pedestrian travel in order to function successfully.
As discussed in the Design Speed section of this guide, lower vehicle travel speeds are desirable in areas with a significant pedestrian presence. While reducing travel speeds can be challenging, especially in retrofit situations, design tools and planning methods such as TRAFFIC CALMING, enforcement, and appropriate geometric design and signing can help achieve this objective. The safety and appropriateness of planting street trees in medians or along the side of the road is a highly debated point among transportation researchers and practitioners. While street trees are often considered a desirable addition to the STREETSCAPE, some agencies are uncomfortable allowing trees to be planted in the CLEAR ZONE. According to research by AASHTO and other transportation organizations, some curb types may not be effective in preventing vehicles from crossing over the curb and striking trees at speeds above 30 mph. However, special low-profile barriers can be used to eliminate the potential safety hazard created by planting street trees along corridors with travel speeds in excess of 30 mph. As with any design choice, however, there are a number of tradeoffs which must be balanced. In small town downtown corridors, the transition from a high-speed, mobility-focused ROADWAY outside the town to a lower-speed, pedestrian- and access-oriented segment within the downtown is a critical safety issue. This transition must begin well before a vehicle enters the main street area, with attention to proper signing and visibility.
ResourcesPDFs:
Links:
|
|
| Last Updated ( Wednesday, 07 February 2007 ) |

