| Safety |
|
|
ArticleSuccessful great streets should produce transportation and LAND USE solutions that are both safe and feasible, while at the same time balancing other community values. Above all else, the public values safety and expects that transportation agencies will only implement solutions that provide an acceptable level of safety. The geometric design for a thoroughfare should properly reflect safety for all modes of travel. It should do so within the context of a host of constraints and considerations, including the type of place, land use features (both existing and planned), roadside and community effects, and cost considerations. Consider the images below - where would you feel safer walking?
Safety is a broad term and can have a variety of meanings depending on the setting. In the world of great street planning and design, two types of safety are often referred to: nominal safety and SUBSTANTIVE SAFETY.
For great streets, we are most interested in the issue of substantive safety. A great street design element should not necessarily be deemed unsafe simply because it does not comply with a particular standard or guideline. While noncompliance can be an issue, a thoroughfare's substantive safety - its "track record" - is a more fundamental consideration and is based on actual performance at a specific location. When we talk about substantive safety for great streets, we are talking primarily about the crash risk that exists for all modes of travel: vehicular, pedestrian, bicycle, and transit. Great streets must provide environments in which all of these users can operate safely, without risk (or fear) of being involved in a crash. There are two very important great street characteristics to point out in this regard: 1. High pedestrian presence is a hallmark of most great streets. In order to encourage such presence, the place must provide a safe environment for these users.
Specific Points for Downtown Main Streets:
East-West Gateway has identified pedestrian safety as a critical component of the region’s travel safety initiative, based in part on the following considerations:
In response to the above points, East-West Gateway has identified six key objectives for improving pedestrian travel safety in the St. Louis region. Five of these objectives are based on the National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 500 series – Volume 10: A Guide for Reducing Collisions Involving Pedestrians. The six objectives are as follows: 1. Reduce the speed of motor vehicles in areas where pedestrians travel 2. Improve SIGHT DISTANCE and visibility for motor vehicles and pedestrians
3. Reduce pedestrian exposure to vehicular traffic (the fewer vehicle miles traveled, the safer 4. Improve pedestrian access and MOBILITY 5. Improve pedestrian and motorist safety, awareness, and behavior 6. Improve safety features on automobiles to minimize injuries in pedestrian crashes
As discussed in the Design Speed section of this guide, lower vehicle travel speeds are desirable in areas with a significant pedestrian presence. While reducing travel speeds can be challenging, especially in retrofit situations, design tools and planning methods such as TRAFFIC CALMING, enforcement, and appropriate geometric design and signing can help achieve this objective.
ResourcesPDFs: Links:
|

